神马

原诺安基金投资部执行总监“老鼠仓”非法获利1445万元，被判有期徒刑11年_邹翔_邹凡_我的网站

夜市人生

A | WOBURN, Mass. -- The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency on Monday proposed banning the cancer-causing chemical trichloroethylene, which can be found in consumer products including automobile brake cleaners, furniture care and arts and crafts spray coating. The move would end a nearly four decade battle to ban the chemical known as TCE, which can cause sudden death or kidney cancer if a person is exposed to high levels of it, and other neurological harm even at lower exposure over a long period.EPA’s recent risk-evaluation studies found that as much as 250 million pounds of TCE are still produced in the United States annually. One of the first places the chemical raised concern was in Massachusetts, where it was linked to contaminated drinking water in the city of Woburn. Two locations there were ultimately designated as massive Superfund sites. Monday's news conference was held at one of them, a location which now serves as a transportation center.“For far too long, TCE has left a toxic legacy in communities across America," said Michal Freedhoff, the EPA’s assistant administrator for the Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution Prevention. “Today, EPA is taking a major step to protect people from exposure to this cancer-causing chemical.” Massachusetts Sen. Edward Markey, who has led the effort to ban TCE, welcomed the move. “With this rule, we can see a future where we will no longer be manufacturing, processing and distributing a chemical known to be deadly,” Markey said. “We will no longer be exposing American families, communities and workers to a toxic chemical legacy that leaves questions, cancer and catastrophe in its wake.”Markey called the effort personal, citing his long-time work with Anne Anderson, a resident-turned-activist whose son Jimmy died in 1981 of leukemia.“Since Anne and I met in 1980, we have been partners in the effort to clean up Woburn, to get justice for her son, and to save other families from seeing their children fall sick as a result of contamination,” Markey said. "Thanks to the advocacy of Anne Anderson and the action of the EPA, the era of corporations using communities like Woburn as dumping grounds for toxic TCE is over.” A 1982 lawsuit over the contaminated water supply involved eight Woburn families, including the Andersons. The case garnered national attention and led to the book and movie titled “A Civil Action.” The American Chemistry Council said in a statement that TCE has several important uses in packaging and in formulating products. The proposed rule “is inconsistent with the underlying science,” the council said, calling on the EPA to avoid unnecessarily restricting valuable industrial uses for the chemical. “EPA must base its risk management proposals on best available science, including accurate assessments of exposure," the industry group said. “Where uses of chemistries have decreased over time, this must be reflected in EPA’s underlying risk assessment, because decreased use reduces potential exposure.”Meanwhile, environmental groups praised the proposed rule, which would take effect in a year. “EPA followed the science, listened to impacted communities, and proposed one of the strongest chemical regulations in recent history,” Earthjustice Senior Attorney Jonathan Kalmuss-Katz said in a statement. “Some chemicals are simply too harmful to remain on the market." TCE is used to make refrigerants and in solvents that remove grease from metal parts. It is also used in carpet cleaners, laundry spot removers and hoof polish for horses. The chemical presents an “unreasonable risk of injury to health or the environment” in 52 of 54 uses in industrial and consumer products, the EPA has found.“I am overwhelmed that all of you are here to acknowledge everything that has happened and everything that was bad has turned good,” Anderson said. “I owe so much to you people to keep the fight going, making sure that everybody is safe and that toxic chemicals like TCE will no longer exist.”The proposed ban stems from a major expansion of EPA's regulatory powers under a landmark 2016 law that overhauled rules governing tens of thousands of toxic chemicals in everyday products, from household cleaners to clothing and furniture.The statute authorized new rules for tens of thousands of toxic chemicals found in everyday products, including substances such as asbestos and TCE, that for decades have been known to cause cancer but were largely unregulated under federal law. Known as the Frank Lautenberg Chemical Safety Act, the law was intended to clear up a hodgepodge of state rules governing chemicals and to update the Toxic Substances Control Act of 1976.The 2016 law required the EPA to evaluate chemicals and put in place protections against unreasonable risks. The agency moved to ban asbestos last year and has also proposed banning methylene chloride, perchloroethylene and carbon tetrachloride.__ Associated Press writer Matthew Daly in Washington contributed to this report.。

原标题：原诺安基金投资部执行总监“老鼠仓”非法获利1445万元，被判有期徒刑11年近日，判决文书网公布原诺安基金投资部执行总监、基金经理邹翔“老鼠仓”的判决结果。

B | 判决书显示，邹翔任诺安基金投资部执行总监兼基金经理期间，将未公开信息泄露给其弟邹凡，利用“邹某”、“田某”两个证券账户进行趋同交易，在沪深两市趋同交易额合计4.17亿元，非法获利2355.04万元。涉嫌利用未公开信息交易罪被调查后，邹翔为谋求从宽处理，多次向公职人员行贿，金额共计350万元。

C | 对此，法院判决称，邹翔犯利用未公开信息交易罪、行贿罪、对有影响力的人行贿罪，决定对其执行有期徒刑11年，并处罚金1445万元。

D | 兄弟合伙做“老鼠仓”，非法获利2355万公开信息显示，邹翔具备银行、券商、公募基金从业背景，2010年3月至2015年1月期间，邹翔担任诺安公司投资部执行总监兼基金经理，管理诺安先锋混合基金。目前，这只基金由杨谷、张堃共同管理，规模42.96亿元，近三年业绩走势强劲，业绩排名明显上升，今年至今收益率-7.55%，在同类产品中排名476/2675。而在邹翔管理期间，该基金业绩则处于中下游，2014年、2015年分别排名230/432、265/459。

E | 据判决书公布的情况，邹翔任职期间，曾利用职务便利将该基金账户投资股票的品种、动向等未公开信息，泄露给其弟邹凡，进而指使邹凡利用实际控制的“邹凡”、“田某”两个证券账户进行趋同交易，非法获利共计2355.04万元。据深交所与上交分别出具的涉案私人账户与“诺安先锋”基金趋同汇总表，证明涉案私人账户通过深圳证券交易所交易的股票共43支，与“诺安先锋”基金股票交易趋同交易的股票数20支，占比46.51%，趋同交易额2.18亿元。

F | “邹凡”的私人账户通过上海证券交易所交易的股票共7支，与“诺安先锋”基金股票交易趋同交易的股票数3支，占比42.86%，趋同交易额19.87万元；“田某”的私人账户通过上海证券交易所交易的股票共53支，与“诺安先锋”基金股票交易趋同交易的股票数34支，占比64.15%，趋同交易额1.99亿元。

G | 据邹翔供述，其与邹凡二人会通过电话、微信、聚会等多种方式，就股票投资进行交流。邹翔会就其掌握分析的股票情况、业务进展等向邹凡进行股票推荐，并建议其买入或卖出相应股票。邹凡听从邹翔的建议进行证券交易，其买卖股票盈利后会分给邹翔部分。

H | 邹凡称，其与邹翔曾一起操作“邹凡”的股票账户，后因担心对邹翔有影响，故于2007年安排其亲属田某开设股票账户，供邹凡使用。

I | 另有证人称，邹翔使用的“杨某”、“邹翔”账号下单均为邹翔本人操作，账号与密码均是他在使用。2017年，邹翔因涉嫌犯利用未公开信息交易罪被重庆市公安局立案侦查。为谋求从宽处理，向公职人员行贿350万元被立案调查后，为谋求在侦查阶段撤销案件或从宽处理，邹翔多次向国家机关工作人员行贿。判决书显示，邹翔通过中间人请托该案承办人，时任重庆市公安局经济犯罪侦查总队五支队支队长王某予以关照和提供帮助。王某接受请托后，多次与邹翔商量如何降低涉案金额、泄露案件资料及案件办理情况。为此，邹翔于2017年5月至2019年4月期间，先后13次单独或委托曾某、唐某2等人送给王某共计350万元。

J | 从判决书披露的细节来看，2017年3月，曾某其经朋友介绍认识了邹翔与邹凡。他们因利用未公开信息交易被立案侦查，希望能得到从轻处理。曾某答应帮忙后，邹翔将装有100万元现金的拉杆帆布包放在其办公室，称是打点的费用。

K | 后曾某介绍唐某给邹翔两兄弟认识。过了一段时间，唐某称帮邹翔办事需要费用，曾某便将装有100万元现金的拉杆帆布包给了唐某。

L | 2017年4月下旬，邹翔、邹凡投案自首，王某为二人办理了取保候审手续。同年5月中旬，王某去北京出差期间，收受邹翔给予的20万元现金并承诺予以关照；此后直至2019年4月，又先后11次收到邹翔亲自给予的共计230万元。另外，2017年11月中下旬，王某在唐某家车库内，收受唐某代邹翔送的100万元现金。判决书显示，王某多次帮助邹翔分析案情，完善数据分析报告，并交给邹翔一份载有其在诺安公司任职期间管理数据的光盘，让邹翔尽快分析数据，降低涉案的获利金额。重庆市第一中级人民法院判决称，邹翔犯利用未公开信息交易罪、行贿罪、对有影响力的人行贿罪，决定执行有期徒刑11年，并处罚金1445万元。邹凡犯利用未公开信息交易罪，判处有期徒刑3年，并处罚金1000万元。