A | 美国知名人工智能学者加里·马库斯（Gary Marcus）7月20日在个人博客发文称，中国人工智能模型已“几乎追平”美国最先进水平，美国不可能在这场AI竞赛中“获胜”，华盛顿应停止将AI视为零和博弈，转而探索国际合作与公共产品路径。 As artificial intelligence tools become increasingly accessible, concerns around misuse and consent are growing louder across the entertainment industry. Several actors have already voiced alarm over AI generated images that circulate online without permission. Now, actor Nivetha Thomas has added her voice to this ongoing conversation, issuing a strong public warning against the circulation of AI generated content that misuses her identity.A Firm Stand Against Digital MisuseTaking to her social media platforms, Nivetha directly addressed the issue, calling the creation and sharing of such images a serious violation of privacy. In a sharply worded note, she urged pages and users responsible for circulating AI generated visuals of her to remove the content immediately. She also appealed to the wider public to refrain from resharing or engaging with such material in any form, stressing that participation only legitimises an unethical practice.Nivetha described the misuse as deeply disturbing, unacceptable, and unlawful. She made it clear that her statement was being placed on record, and that anonymity would not shield those responsible. According to her, continued circulation of such content would be treated as deliberate misuse of her identity and could invite legal consequences. The message reflected a growing frustration among artists who feel exposed in an online ecosystem that often moves faster than regulation. It has come to my attention that AI-generated images misusing my identity and a recent photograph I shared on my social media are being circulated online.The creation and circulation of such content without consent is deeply disturbing, unacceptable, and unlawful. It… — Nivetha Thomas (@i_nivethathomas) December 17, 2025 Actors Push Back Against AI AbuseNivetha Thomas is not alone in raising concerns about artificial intelligence and its unchecked application. In recent months, several prominent actors including Shriya Saran, Aditi Rao Hydari, Keerthy Suresh, and Sai Pallavi have spoken openly about the harmful effects of AI generated images. Many of them have cautioned fans and social media users against participating in trends that cross ethical boundaries under the guise of creativity or admiration.Earlier this week, Sreeleela also shared a heartfelt message highlighting the darker side of technological advancement. Requesting social media users to stop supporting what she described as AI generated nonsense, the actor drew a clear line between using technology responsibly and abusing it. She pointed out that innovation is meant to simplify life, not create fear or insecurity, particularly for artists who already navigate intense public scrutiny.Sreeleela further argued that the misuse of AI is increasingly becoming a safety concern for actors, especially women, in the film industry. Her comments echoed a larger industry wide anxiety about deepfake content, manipulated images, and the psychological toll of losing control over one’s own likeness.Globally too, actors and creators have been demanding clearer legal frameworks to address AI related violations. From Hollywood strikes to public advisories by performers across industries, the message is consistent. Consent must remain central, even in the age of rapidly evolving technology. View this post on Instagram A post shared by SREELEELA (@sreeleela14) Nivetha Thomas and the Road AheadOn the professional front, Nivetha Thomas was last seen in the Telugu film 35 Chinna Katha Kaadu, directed by Nanda Kishore Emani. The film also featured Arundev Pothula, Vishwadev Rachakonda, and Priyadarshi Pulikonda in key roles. Known for her grounded performances and thoughtful choice of roles, Nivetha has built a reputation for balancing mainstream appeal with strong content driven cinema.Her decision to speak up now underscores how personal and pressing the issue of AI misuse has become for actors. It is no longer a distant technological debate, but a lived reality that affects dignity, safety, and mental wellbeing. By publicly drawing boundaries and warning of legal escalation, Nivetha joins a growing movement of artists demanding accountability in digital spaces.As conversations around artificial intelligence continue to evolve, voices like hers are pushing the industry and audiences alike to rethink where innovation ends and exploitation begins. Also Read: Nani resumes shooting for Tuck Jagadish。 马库斯是美国知名人工智能学者、纽约大学名誉教授，长期研究机器学习与认知科学，近年来因主张发展更可靠的通用人工智能而备受关注。 马库斯在博文中提到，中国人工智能公司月之暗面（Moonshot AI）近日发布的Kimi K3模型，在性能上已与美国顶尖模型大体相当，而且采用“开放权重”模式，用户可免费下载并在本地运行。他认为，这一消息是上周美国股市相关板块下跌的原因之一，也再次动摇了OpenAI和Anthropic等公司的商业模式。
B | 2026年7月20日，观众在上海举办的2026世界人工智能大会上参观月之暗面的大模型Kimi展台。IC Photo 他指出，在Kimi K3之前，智谱GLM 5.2、阿里巴巴新一代通义千问模型也已引发广泛关注。 “这不是偶然事件，而是趋势。
C | ”他写道。 马库斯表示，他早在2025年初DeepSeek发布后就曾预测：如果美国继续把资源集中投入大语言模型（LLM），就无法取得对中国的决定性优势；最终双方更可能走向“平局”。
D | 他当时还预测，由于缺乏真正的技术护城河，OpenAI难以实现稳定盈利，英伟达也会面临竞争压力，美国《芯片与科学法案》对遏制中国作用有限，而模型会越来越便宜、高效，但幻觉和可靠性问题仍将长期存在。 “现在看来，这些事情基本都发生了。” 在马库斯看来，美国政府过于接近硅谷，几乎把硅谷关于生成式AI的愿景当成现实，导致战略误判。他批评说，美国“不应该一开始就把全部赌注压在生成式AI上”，因为这一领域从来没有展现出足够强的技术壁垒。 对于当前局面，他建议美国国会展开调查，包括美国为何丧失领先优势、是否过度押注单一技术、知识产权保护是否不足、限制移民是否导致人才流失等。他特别提到，有的中国AI企业创始人曾在美国求学，之后回到中国发展，这值得美国反思。 更重要的是战略选择。
E | 马库斯列出了特朗普政府可能考虑的七种方案，包括：不提供补贴、禁止开源、通过监管为美国公司构筑“护城河”、救助大型AI实验室、全面封禁中国模型、将OpenAI和Anthropic收归国有等。 他对其中多数方案持否定态度，尤其反对利用监管手段排挤中国竞争者，认为这会推高价格、压制创新，并伤害美国本土初创企业。 他还反对由政府出资“救助”OpenAI等公司，直言这些企业目前“基本都是亏损项目”，AI行业也尚未证明自身具备可持续盈利能力。 马库斯最终提出，他最支持的方案是放弃“赢得AI战争”的零和思维，推动建立类似欧洲核子研究中心（CERN）的国际AI合作机制，把人工智能建设成全球公共产品。 他回顾称，自己早在2016年就提出建立“AI版CERN”的设想，让各国科学家围绕医学、科学等明确目标开展合作，并向全世界共享成果，而不是由少数国家或企业垄断。 文章特别提到，中方最近在人工智能大会上重申愿同各国推动人工智能向善普惠发展，为国际讨论打开了一个重要窗口。 “也许现在终于到了认真考虑这件事的时候。
F | ”他写道，“如果能把AI重新放回公共领域，通过国际合作服务于医学和科学，这或许是目前最有希望的方向。” 马库斯敦促特朗普说，如果他真想获得诺贝尔和平奖，这么做或许是一个契机，并与中国达成合作，把人工智能用于公共利益，将会是一个“送给人类的厚礼”。
G | 本文系观察者网独家稿件，未经授权，不得转载。
Current article:http://b1w0baq.cibianpangjujiusu.cyou/news/20260826_2477123.html
Published on:19:45:05
